Monday, October 31, 2016

This Is Not The Right Year For This

I just don't think it's the right year. There's too much at stake, and a vote for Clinton is too risky. Firstly, we need to seriously consider the fact that Donald Trump has no chance of winning. As of October 28, the most recent poll shows Clinton ahead by 5 points. In 2012 the largest poll completed on October 28 showed Obama and Romney tied 48% to 48%. Obama still won, and not by a small margin. He won by 126 electoral votes. Romney could have won California and Oregon, and he still would have lost the election. To win this election Trump would need to get at least 63 more electoral votes than Romney won in 2012. The easiest way to do this would be winning the four states that Obama won by the narrowest margins: Florida, Ohio, Virginia, and Colorado. (Of course he would also need to maintain all of the states that Romney won in 2012). Looking at some of the details of Colorado show just how impossible it will be for Trump to win that state. In case you hadn't noticed, this election is an interesting little rematch for the two major third party candidates. Jill Stein and Gary Johnson were the Green and Libertarian candidates in 2012. The Colorado vote totals in 2012 were 51% for Obama and 46% for Romney. Part of the reason it wasn't even close is that Johnson did relatively well there with 1.4%. I think it is safe to say that Johnson will improve substantially on that number this year. Personally, I would be very surprised if trump were even to win any of the other three states.
And what if Trump does win. We need to take an honest look at the fact that this scenario would not be the nightmare that liberals imagine. Donald trump is a notable candidate. Notable for his eagerness to offend people, but not particularly notable for how right wing his positions are. According to insidegov.com Trump is to the left of Ted Cruz in every category (individual, domestic, economic, and defense). He is left of Marco Rubio in every category except economic issues. Notably, his score for defense issues is identical to Clinton's. As for the crazy stuff that Trump has proposed for immigration policy, this is some of the least concerning, since it has no chance of being enacted even if he were to somehow get elected. Trump has made numerous enemies among Republicans in Congress. A Trump presidency would resemble something similar to Jesse Ventura's term as governor of Minnesota. Trump's proposals would be ignored and Republicans and Democrats in Congress would negotiate to govern without him. 

Then again, we must consider the possibility of losing the progress we've made. After all, Guantanamo is closed, and the wars in the Middle East have been ended. Actually, never mind, I just checked; 60 people are still detained in Guantanamo, and 8,400 troops remain in Afghanistan. What happened in Libya illustrated the fact that Obama oversaw continuation of the imperialist aggression that George W. Bush began. Any notion that the bombing of Libya had any humanitarian motives were shattered when it was revealed that the CIA had been collaborating with Muammar Gaddafi for its torture programs. Scott Horton wrote of the Justice Department's handling of this information, "But this very whitewashing raises fundamental doubt about the Obama Administration’s commitment to ending torture by American intelligence operatives. To the contrary, the Obama Administration’s handling of the matter appears to retain torture as a viable option for American foreign policy." Remeber that Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State during this time. Perhaps some of Obama's shortcomings can be explained by the fact that Republicans controlled at least half of congress for most of his presidency. We should look back to the golden age: 2009 to 2011 when Democrats dominated the Senate, House, and the White house, and the Holy Grail was obtained: healthcare reform. We on the left were hoping for nationalized healthcare: a free system under which the hospitals and clinics would not be controlled by for profit corporations. We were willing to settle for single payer healthcare. We didn't get that either. At least universal healthcare is progress right? Except that we didn't get that either. While I do recognize that Obamacare is a slight improvement from what we had previously (particularly for people who were unable to get insurance due to preexisting conditions), in the end we got regressive taxes on medical devices and Cadillac insurance plans, premiums that are continuing to become less and less affordable, and all for a decrease in the uninsured from 17.1% to 11%. 
Why waste your vote on Clinton when you have the opportunity to contribute to real change? Jill Stein will not win this election, but the more votes she gets, the more it builds the confidence of the working class, and develops a movement. Getting 5% of the vote in some states can result in important ballot access, major party status, and federal funding. The more people vote for Democrats, the more the cycle continues. People don't support third parties because they don't get many votes, and people don't vote for third parties because they don't have much support. 
What world will we live in twenty years from now? Will we be overwhelmed with refugees fleeing rising sea levels, water shortages, war... Will we be refugees? Will we tell our children that one day long ago we had an opportunity to build a movement that had the potential to create a rational economy and a real democracy, but that we didn't take it. Because we were just used to voting for the second worst candidate.