Monday, April 20, 2020

The Curious Case of Chewy

I'll start with the disclosure that I have been long one Chewy July 17 28 put since January 28. As of yet, Chewy has failed to go in the direction I need it to. As is the case with most “financial news” out there, most of the analysis of Chewy I've seen has been superficial, so I thought I'd put some of my own armchair speculations into writing. Firstly, I'll give the basic rationale against Chewy. Chewy is basically an online retailer of pet food, pet medications, and other pet products. By traditional valuation methods, Chewy is the most overpriced stock on the market, and the competition for that title isn't even close. Listed below are the six largest market cap US companies with both negative total equity, and negative earning estimates for both current year and next year earnings. 
Company         Market Cap  P/Sales  Quick Ratio
Chewy           17.6B       3.63     .28
Wayfair         8.5B        .93      .82
Nutanix         3.3B        2.63     1.64
Tubman
Centers         2.5B        3.8      .81
Biohaven
Pharmaceutical  2.2B        N/A      4.96
Cincinnati Bell 746M        .49      .69
With equity and earnings both negative, we can turn to the price to sales ratio for valuation purposes. Biohaven Pharmaceutical has no revenue, but it's a biotech company, and therefore can't be meaningfully compared to other companies through these valuation methods. Only Taubman Centers, a real estate investment trust that invests in commercial property, has a worse P/sales (and not by a huge amount). I also listed the quick ratio (a liquidity measure). By this measure, Chewy is substantially worse than any of the other five companies.
So why are so many people buying Chewy stock? For some, sales growth is the driver. Quarterly sales growth for the past three quarters has been 4.1%, 6.6%, and 10.2%. For others, the narrative of Chewy as the next Amazon is compelling. Recently, Chewy stock has performed very well because it is identified as a 'stay at home stock' that is gaining customers as a result of the pandemic. Some analysts, however, see this as an area of concern. The increased business during the pandemic will increase costs (hiring more employees, etc.), but the customers may return to their favorite brick and mortar stores when the pandemic ends. It should also be noted that pet stores have generally stayed open during the pandemic.
While you are probably familiar with Chewy as an online pet store, what you might not know is that Chewy is a subsidiary of PetSmart. More on that later.

Adendum:

Chewy's 2019 annual report states:

"As of March 26, 2020, PetSmart beneficially owned more than 50% of our outstanding shares of common stock and, together with its affiliates, exercised control over more than 95% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. So long as PetSmart and/or its affiliates remain our controlling stockholder they will be able to control, directly or indirectly, and subject to applicable law, all matters affecting us"

PetSmart was acquired by BC Partners, a private equity firm, in 2015 for $8.68B. The details of how the subsidiaries within subsidiaries are organized is a little complicated, but essentially BC Partners acquired Chewy in 2017. Chewy then went public in June of 2019 (with BC Partners/PetSmart retaining majority ownership). This brings me to the crux of my question. Why would PetSmart spend two years developing a competitor to it's own business, then sell this competitor through an IPO? The question is sharpened by the fact that PetSmart has its own website selling the same types of products that Chewy sells, with features like free delivery and autoship, just like Chewy offers. In fact, their websites have somewhat similar color schemes and fonts in some areas. Let's take a look at another excerpt from Chewy's annual report:

"PetSmart is not restricted from competing with us in the pet supplies business, including as a result of acquiring a company that operates as an e-tailer for pet supplies. Due to the significant resources of PetSmart, including financial resources, name recognition and know-how resulting from the previous management of our business, PetSmart could have a significant competitive advantage over us should it decide to engage in the type of business we conduct, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations."

So, now we arrive at my conspiracy theory. Chewy is building a brand and customer base that is quite valuable, but the project is being carried out in a way that is likely to be financially unsustainable. Once Chewy nears bankruptcy, PetSmart will acquire the rest of the company at a small fraction of the current share price. This will complete PetSmart's long term plot to get investors to pay for its e-commerce division. 

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Covid-19 Deaths and Population Density by State

It is doubtless that the extreme population density of New York City has played a role in New York's status as the state most heavily hit by Covid-19. I compared Covid-19 deaths/1,000,000 population to population density for each state (as well as District of Columbia and Puerto Rico). The data was obtained from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/ on April 14, 2020. 
I didn't include District of Columbia in the chart because it's population density makes it too much of an outlier. Other outliers (New York in particular) still make the chart mostly unreadable, so I included the data below. I sorted states by deaths per 1,000,000 population divided by population density, and ranked the states. By some logic this orders the states from best to worst performance after accounting for differences in population density. Of course, many other factors have had an impact. The most immediate thing people might suggest is that Puerto Rico and Hawaii performed well because they are islands, and therefore naturally isolated. This might not explain it completely; Hawaii also has the longest life expectancy of all states, and Puerto Rico is not far behind it. Perhaps the general health of the population is an important factor. It should also be noted, that while Alaska performed worst by a huge margin in this measure, about half of Alaska's population lives in the Anchorage metropolitan area, making its overall population density number more skewed than other states.
RankStatePopulation/Square MileDeaths/1,000,000 Population(Deaths/1,000,000 Population)/(Population/Square Mi)

 District of Columbia11011760.0069021887

 Puerto Rico1046130.0124282983
1 Hawaii22260.027027027
2 North Carolina206110.0533980583
3 Florida378240.0634920635
4 West Virginia7650.0657894737
5 Rhode Island1021690.0675808031
6 Maryland618440.071197411
7 California251190.0756972112
8 Ohio284240.0845070423
9 Virginia212180.0849056604
10 Delaware485430.0886597938
11 Tennessee160160.1
12 Texas105110.1047619048
13 South Carolina162180.1111111111
14 New Hampshire148170.1148648649
15 Georgia177240.1355932203
16 Massachusetts8711240.1423650976
17 Pennsylvania286460.1608391608
18 Utah3660.1666666667
19 Arkansas57100.1754385965
20 Minnesota68130.1911764706
21 Kentucky112230.2053571429
22 Alabama95210.2210526316
23 New Jersey12182750.2257799672
24 Connecticut7411680.2267206478
25 Missouri88200.2272727273
26 Iowa55140.2545454545
27 Wisconsin106270.2547169811
28 Illinois231620.2683982684
29 Indiana184530.2880434783
30 Arizona60180.3
31 Oregon41130.3170731707
32 Maine43140.3255813953
33 Wyoming620.3333333333
34 Nebraska2490.375
35 Oklahoma57250.4385964912
36 Mississippi63330.5238095238
37 Kansas36210.5833333333
38 South Dakota1170.6363636364
39 Vermont67450.671641791
40 Washington107720.6728971963
41 New Mexico17150.8823529412
42 Michigan1751610.92
43 Montana771
44 Idaho20201
45 Colorado52551.0576923077
46 North Dakota10111.1
47 New York4205131.2214285714
48 Nevada26411.5769230769
49 Louisiana1081901.7592592593
50 Alaska11111