Tuesday, November 17, 2020

The Bachelorette - Season 16

I've posted a lot about politics and economics on here, and I thought I should switch to something more serious: predictions for the current season of The Bachelorette. Tayshia has just replaced Clare, and as of yet has not eliminated anyone. 

 Episode 6 updates:

I guess I was expecting Ed, Noah, and Demar to be gone earlier, but the bracket still looks good.

Episode 7 updates:
I still have no upsets in the bracket, but I'll really need Ed, Noah, and Demar to go home this week to maintain that status.



Tuesday, September 15, 2020

2016 Electoral Analysis

I again made a chart designed to help estimate the likelihood of the incumbent president's reelection. The percent vote margin in the 2016 presidential election is shown for each state (note that a few states separate Congressional Districts in the electoral process). The states are shown in order with the strongest margin for Clinton on the left, and the strongest margin for Trump on the right. The number after each state name is the number of electoral votes for that state. Trump's margin of victory was 74 electoral votes, meaning that half that number (37) electoral votes will need to move from Trump to the Democrat for Trump to lose in 2020. Based on this data, this would most easily happen with three states (Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) moving from Trump to the Democrats. Without looking at any polls, I would estimate that this is a possibility. Trump won these states largely because of promises of manufacturing and mining jobs. While Trump did achieve a lot of economic growth and low unemployment before the pandemic started, the largest job growth was actually in healthcare and education. Mining and manufacturing actually continued to lose jobs. On the other hand, the Democrats have continued to blunder their way through the election, showing no signs of a winning strategy, and failing to identify galvanizing candidates. 


Friday, August 7, 2020

Gold, Copper, Natural Gas, Oil

Many people watching federal debt levels and Federal Reserve policy are bracing for inflation as far as the eye can see, but is the ‘buy gold’ mantra really the best way to go given the current situation? I compared one year of futures prices for gold, copper, oil, and natural gas. With gold near all-time-highs, and oil still far below last year’s prices, oil may have more upside potential. Moreover, I think there is strong political will for massive infrastructure spending, so a commodity that benefits from industrial activity is likely to perform well. I think there is a strong case for oil producers being the winners for the second half of 2020.
 

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Multiples and Total Return for 33 Mega Cap Stocks

Multiples are a key part of fundamental analysis used in stock picking. There is some debate over which multiples are best, or whether any of them are really useful. I put data for seven multiples into a spreadsheet for 33 of the highest market cap stocks traded on US exchanges. (I attempted to analyze the highest market cap stocks, but a a few were excluded because incomplete data was available for them.) I obtained the multiple data on Sunday, November 10 (primarily from TD Ameritrade). I calculated the total return (including dividends) supposing someone bought at the opening price on November 11, 2019, and sold at the closing price on August 4, 2020. I then charted the results for each multiple. The results were not promising for people who use multiples to invest. The linear regressions should be expected to have negative slopes, but this was only the case for PEG ratio. In other words, companies with low earnings and low book values had better returns for investors. I think I'll check the returns after a full year before I start buying stock with the lowest earnings I can find. 





Friday, July 17, 2020

Percentage of Deaths Caused by Covid-19

I calculated the percentage of all deaths reported by the CDC that involved Covid-19. The data was last updated July 16. The total number of deaths is much lower for recent weeks because of a lag in processing of death certificates, but unless the lag for Covid-19 involved deaths is greater than deaths from other causes, the percentages still indicated that the pandemic (as measured by number of deaths) peaked in mid April and is now in decline. Reporting of surging infection rates is probably mostly a result of increased testing, but the discrepancy between number of infections and number of deaths is likely also due to improved treatments and the fact that new infections may be affecting healthier populations as compared to those infected in April.

Week    All Deaths  Deaths From  Percentage of Deaths Caused by
Ending  Involving   All Causes   Covid-19
        Covid-19
04/18/20   16928    76133        22.2%
04/25/20   15261    73060        20.9%
05/02/20   12997    68319        19.0%
05/09/20   10983    65572        16.7%
05/16/20    8972    62896        14.3%
05/23/20    6984    59608        11.7%
05/30/20    5921    56843        10.4%
06/06/20    4738    55281         8.6%
06/13/20    3863    53233         7.3%
06/20/20    3258    51142         6.4%
06/27/20    2501    46892         5.3%
07/04/20    1440    36602         3.9%
07/11/20     413    19408         2.1%

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Minnesota and Racial Disparity

Criticism of Minnesota's racial disparities is not new, but the murder of George Floyd and ensuing protests and riots have amplified the attention these disparities are getting from news media. According to US News, Minnesota ranks 43rd in terms of equality as measured by racial income gap. That's pretty bad, but it should be noted that California (the most populous state) ranks 48th. A popular inference seems to be that Minnesota's high racial disparity indicates a greater level of racism in Minnesota (despite Minnesota's 'liberal facade'). I live in Ward 9 of Minneapolis, which is where George Floyd was killed. With the exception of Donald Trump and Mike Pence, every elected politician representing Ward 9 is a Democrat. That includes the city council, mayor, county commissioner, members of Congress, governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, state auditor, and state attorney general. I will also note that of these 13 elected politicians, two are Latina, one is Native American, and four are black. I decided to compare Minnesota to the five states with lowest racial income gap. In order starting with the lowest gap, these are: New Hampshire, Kentucky, Virginia, Missouri, and Washington. I'll preface this by saying that I don't claim to have a definitive measurement of racism, but I do think the judgement that Minnesota is particularly racist may be ignoring the context of the situation. Firstly, we'll consider the percentage of the vote Donald Trump received in these states in 2016:
New Hampshire 46.61%
Kentucky      62.52%
Virginia      44.41%
Missouri      56.77%
Washington    36.83%
Minnesota     44.92%
Of course, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are both white. I also analyzed the propensity for non-white people to be elected to Congress by these states. The first numeric column is the percentage of the congressional delegation that is non-white. The second is the percentage of the state's population that is non-white (2019 estimate). The last column is the ratio of non-white people in the congressional delegation to non-white people in the state.
               CD          Population          Ratio (CD/Population)
New Hampshire   0           6.11%               0
Kentucky        0          12.21%               0
Virginia       15.38%      31.42%               .49
Missouri       20.00%      17.21%              1.16
Washington     16.67%      22.73%               .73
Minnesota      10.00%      14.70%               .68
The data from this measure is limited because of the small size of some of the congressional delegations. New Hampshire and Kentucky have all white congressional delegations, but these delegations only consist of four and eight people, respectively. The ratio in the last column indicates the degree to which non-white people are underrepresented in the delegation (or, curiously in the case of Missouri, overrepresented). The data suggests that non-white politicians in Minnesota have a greater propensity for being elected than three out of the five 'most equal states' (after adjusting for the demographics of the state). 
The final statistic I will consider is the change in the proportion of black residents in these states. These are the percentages of 'black or African American alone' for 2000 and 2010, and the percent change of these proportions:
                 2000    2010    Percent Change
New Hampshire    .73%     1.14%  56.16%
Kentucky        7.32%     7.78%   6.28%
Virginia       19.64%    19.39%  -1.27%
Missouri       11.25%    11.58%   2.93%
Washington      3.23%     3.57%  10.53%
Minnesota       3.49%     5.17%  48.14%
While New Hampshire experienced the most rapid increase in its black population, at 1.14% in 2010, the number remains very low. The rate at which Minnesota's black population is increasing is far faster than any of the other four states. While many have decried Minnesota as a bad place for black people to live, the fact remains that black people continue to move there. Other factors, such as birth rate or even emigration of other races, may have had an impact, but with Minnesota's black population increasing 60% over the course of 10 years, it would be reasonable to estimate that most of the black people in Minnesota spent much of their lives in other places. Before states like Kentucky are used as models for Minnesota to remake itself after, other factors impacting racial disparities ought to be considered. 

Monday, April 20, 2020

The Curious Case of Chewy

I'll start with the disclosure that I have been long one Chewy July 17 28 put since January 28. As of yet, Chewy has failed to go in the direction I need it to. As is the case with most “financial news” out there, most of the analysis of Chewy I've seen has been superficial, so I thought I'd put some of my own armchair speculations into writing. Firstly, I'll give the basic rationale against Chewy. Chewy is basically an online retailer of pet food, pet medications, and other pet products. By traditional valuation methods, Chewy is the most overpriced stock on the market, and the competition for that title isn't even close. Listed below are the six largest market cap US companies with both negative total equity, and negative earning estimates for both current year and next year earnings. 
Company         Market Cap  P/Sales  Quick Ratio
Chewy           17.6B       3.63     .28
Wayfair         8.5B        .93      .82
Nutanix         3.3B        2.63     1.64
Tubman
Centers         2.5B        3.8      .81
Biohaven
Pharmaceutical  2.2B        N/A      4.96
Cincinnati Bell 746M        .49      .69
With equity and earnings both negative, we can turn to the price to sales ratio for valuation purposes. Biohaven Pharmaceutical has no revenue, but it's a biotech company, and therefore can't be meaningfully compared to other companies through these valuation methods. Only Taubman Centers, a real estate investment trust that invests in commercial property, has a worse P/sales (and not by a huge amount). I also listed the quick ratio (a liquidity measure). By this measure, Chewy is substantially worse than any of the other five companies.
So why are so many people buying Chewy stock? For some, sales growth is the driver. Quarterly sales growth for the past three quarters has been 4.1%, 6.6%, and 10.2%. For others, the narrative of Chewy as the next Amazon is compelling. Recently, Chewy stock has performed very well because it is identified as a 'stay at home stock' that is gaining customers as a result of the pandemic. Some analysts, however, see this as an area of concern. The increased business during the pandemic will increase costs (hiring more employees, etc.), but the customers may return to their favorite brick and mortar stores when the pandemic ends. It should also be noted that pet stores have generally stayed open during the pandemic.
While you are probably familiar with Chewy as an online pet store, what you might not know is that Chewy is a subsidiary of PetSmart. More on that later.

Adendum:

Chewy's 2019 annual report states:

"As of March 26, 2020, PetSmart beneficially owned more than 50% of our outstanding shares of common stock and, together with its affiliates, exercised control over more than 95% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. So long as PetSmart and/or its affiliates remain our controlling stockholder they will be able to control, directly or indirectly, and subject to applicable law, all matters affecting us"

PetSmart was acquired by BC Partners, a private equity firm, in 2015 for $8.68B. The details of how the subsidiaries within subsidiaries are organized is a little complicated, but essentially BC Partners acquired Chewy in 2017. Chewy then went public in June of 2019 (with BC Partners/PetSmart retaining majority ownership). This brings me to the crux of my question. Why would PetSmart spend two years developing a competitor to it's own business, then sell this competitor through an IPO? The question is sharpened by the fact that PetSmart has its own website selling the same types of products that Chewy sells, with features like free delivery and autoship, just like Chewy offers. In fact, their websites have somewhat similar color schemes and fonts in some areas. Let's take a look at another excerpt from Chewy's annual report:

"PetSmart is not restricted from competing with us in the pet supplies business, including as a result of acquiring a company that operates as an e-tailer for pet supplies. Due to the significant resources of PetSmart, including financial resources, name recognition and know-how resulting from the previous management of our business, PetSmart could have a significant competitive advantage over us should it decide to engage in the type of business we conduct, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations."

So, now we arrive at my conspiracy theory. Chewy is building a brand and customer base that is quite valuable, but the project is being carried out in a way that is likely to be financially unsustainable. Once Chewy nears bankruptcy, PetSmart will acquire the rest of the company at a small fraction of the current share price. This will complete PetSmart's long term plot to get investors to pay for its e-commerce division. 

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Covid-19 Deaths and Population Density by State

It is doubtless that the extreme population density of New York City has played a role in New York's status as the state most heavily hit by Covid-19. I compared Covid-19 deaths/1,000,000 population to population density for each state (as well as District of Columbia and Puerto Rico). The data was obtained from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/ on April 14, 2020. 
I didn't include District of Columbia in the chart because it's population density makes it too much of an outlier. Other outliers (New York in particular) still make the chart mostly unreadable, so I included the data below. I sorted states by deaths per 1,000,000 population divided by population density, and ranked the states. By some logic this orders the states from best to worst performance after accounting for differences in population density. Of course, many other factors have had an impact. The most immediate thing people might suggest is that Puerto Rico and Hawaii performed well because they are islands, and therefore naturally isolated. This might not explain it completely; Hawaii also has the longest life expectancy of all states, and Puerto Rico is not far behind it. Perhaps the general health of the population is an important factor. It should also be noted, that while Alaska performed worst by a huge margin in this measure, about half of Alaska's population lives in the Anchorage metropolitan area, making its overall population density number more skewed than other states.
RankStatePopulation/Square MileDeaths/1,000,000 Population(Deaths/1,000,000 Population)/(Population/Square Mi)

 District of Columbia11011760.0069021887

 Puerto Rico1046130.0124282983
1 Hawaii22260.027027027
2 North Carolina206110.0533980583
3 Florida378240.0634920635
4 West Virginia7650.0657894737
5 Rhode Island1021690.0675808031
6 Maryland618440.071197411
7 California251190.0756972112
8 Ohio284240.0845070423
9 Virginia212180.0849056604
10 Delaware485430.0886597938
11 Tennessee160160.1
12 Texas105110.1047619048
13 South Carolina162180.1111111111
14 New Hampshire148170.1148648649
15 Georgia177240.1355932203
16 Massachusetts8711240.1423650976
17 Pennsylvania286460.1608391608
18 Utah3660.1666666667
19 Arkansas57100.1754385965
20 Minnesota68130.1911764706
21 Kentucky112230.2053571429
22 Alabama95210.2210526316
23 New Jersey12182750.2257799672
24 Connecticut7411680.2267206478
25 Missouri88200.2272727273
26 Iowa55140.2545454545
27 Wisconsin106270.2547169811
28 Illinois231620.2683982684
29 Indiana184530.2880434783
30 Arizona60180.3
31 Oregon41130.3170731707
32 Maine43140.3255813953
33 Wyoming620.3333333333
34 Nebraska2490.375
35 Oklahoma57250.4385964912
36 Mississippi63330.5238095238
37 Kansas36210.5833333333
38 South Dakota1170.6363636364
39 Vermont67450.671641791
40 Washington107720.6728971963
41 New Mexico17150.8823529412
42 Michigan1751610.92
43 Montana771
44 Idaho20201
45 Colorado52551.0576923077
46 North Dakota10111.1
47 New York4205131.2214285714
48 Nevada26411.5769230769
49 Louisiana1081901.7592592593
50 Alaska11111

Friday, February 21, 2020

The Economy, Inflation, and Where to Put Your Money

This is a general guide for where to put your money considering outlook for inflation and the economy. Anyone attempting to use this guide should keep in mind that the economy and inflation parameters are forward looking, e.g. by the time an economic downturn has begun, it is likely too late to move to gold and treasuries.


Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Equities Versus Corporate Bonds

This is a comparison between the earnings yield of the S&P 500 and the yield of BBB rated US corporate bonds (ICE BofAML). This deserves a more full analysis, but I think the key observation would be that bond prices have already moved up in anticipation of a downturn. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be much opportunities other than cash, if like most analysts you are expecting equities to fall.